HMRC have long relied on the Kittel principle in cases of alleged missing trader fraud in relation to VAT. Using Kittel, HMRC contest that a trader ‘knew or should have known’ that the transactions being entered into were connected to fraudulent activity. Cases going through the courts demonstrate that Kittel has a much lower threshold than proving that a trader deliberately defrauded HMRC, and therefore has more likelihood of success.
Source: Mazars
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches