Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- GP’s Coordinating Services for Foundation Subject to VAT, Not Exempt as Medical Services
- No VAT-Taxed Rental Option for New Studio Home Without Sufficient Taxable Use Proven
- ECHR: VAT Assessments in Italmoda Case Are Not Criminal Penalties Under Article 7 ECHR
- Netherlands Keeps 9% VAT for Culture, Raises Accommodation VAT to 21% from 2026
- Internet consultation on new VAT rules for platform economy starting July 2028