Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory B2B e-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Using Peppol by 2030
- Contract Change Does Not Make Previously VAT-Exempt Services Subject to VAT, Court Rules
- Reduced VAT Rate for Access to Cinemas: Definition and Scope under EU and Dutch Law
- Dutch Court Ruling: Lithuanian Staffing Agency’s Housing Fees for Temporary Workers in the Netherlands Disputed
- VAT deduction and unpaid trustee’s salary in the event of bankruptcy
