Assessments for VAT on under declared takings – assessments in time and to best judgment – assessments not displaced and upheld – penalty for deliberate and concealed inaccuracies – held neither but inaccuracies were careless – penalty reduced.”
This is a VAT case. The respondents (or “HMRC”) believe that the appellant has deliberately suppressed his takings for the VAT periods 06/11 to 06/16 inclusive (the “periods”) and that he had concealed this suppression from HMRC. They have raised VAT assessments for each of those periods which amount, in total, to £36,585 (the “VAT assessments”). They have also assessed the appellant to a penalty (the “penalty”) under Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007 (“Schedule 24”) for £27,440 on the basis of deliberate and concealed behaviour (the “penalty assessment”).
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Littlewoods Wins Full VAT Recovery on Product Photography: UKFTT Confirms Direct Link to Taxable Sales
- Story Terrace Ltd v HMRC: FTT Rules Supply of Bespoke Autobiographical Books Is Zero‑Rated
- Supreme Court Confirms No VAT Recovery on Professional Fees for Exempt Share Sales – Hotel La Tour Case
- Nursery Hot Meal Supplies Deemed Standard-Rated Catering, Not Zero-Rated Food, Tribunal Rules
- Appeal Dismissed: Director Held Personally Liable for Deliberate VAT Error on Opted Commercial Property Sale
