- ECJ Case C-532/22 redefined EU VAT rules for virtual event services
- Romanian company Westside Unicat disputed Tax Authority’s decision on VAT
- Case influenced Directive 2022/542, changing VAT treatment for virtual events
- Westside Unicat operated a video recording studio for online video chats
- StreamRay USA Inc. live-streamed video chats organized by Westside Unicat
- Tax Authority determined Westside Unicat owed USD 133,000 in VAT
- Dispute over whether Westside Unicat or StreamRay organized interactive performances
- Regional Court ruled in favor of Westside Unicat, but Tax Authority appealed
- Court of Appeal questioned if Westside Unicat’s services qualified as admission to entertainment events under EU law
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Questions to ECJ – Quick Fixes Under Scrutiny: Is an EU VAT ID a Substantive Requirement for Zero-Rating?
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ VAT C-622/23 (RHTB) – VAT Implications in Work Contract Cancellations
- New GC VAT Case: C-689/25 (British Company) – No details known yet
- Comments on ECJ Case C-726/23 (Arcomet) – ECJ clarifies VAT rules for Transfer Pricing adjustments in intragroup transactions
- ETAF Calls for Modern, Harmonised VAT Rules for EU Travel and Tourism Sector Reform
