- Hoge Raad ruled no reduced VAT rate for online sports platforms
- X considered VAT entrepreneur for virtual sports services
- X does not have physical sports facility for subscribers
- X appealed against paying VAT at general rate
- Lower courts upheld decision that X does not qualify for reduced rate
- European Court of Justice’s definition of ‘sporting facility’ does not apply to X
- X’s services not similar to those covered by reduced rate
- Appeal to Hoge Raad rejected on July 5, 2024
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
