- Case regarding establishment of wholly owned subsidiary by insurance company
- Issue of whether subsequent joint registration for VAT purposes constituted abuse under EU law
- Supreme Court found that construction by companies led to unjustified advantages contrary to purpose of VAT system
- Transactions redefined from VAT-free internal transactions to taxable transactions between separate taxable companies
- Companies could no longer rely on benefits of joint registration due to abuse of VAT rules
- Tax Ministry acknowledged companies could be jointly registered again after leasing IT system to insurance company with VAT for five years
- Companies could rely on joint registration without new application from that point without further application
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
