Anbi X provides supportive care in a domestic setting to people in the terminal phase of their lives X submitted claims for refunds totalling €42.778 submitted, but these were late
The Inspector declared the requests inadmissible and ruled that the amount of the refund was nil X lodged appeals and appeals, but these were declared unfounded
The Court of Appeal ruled that the delay was not excusable and the reliance on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations did not succeed
The request for compensation for non-material damage was rejected, as there was no breach of the reasonable time limit.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No rental-plus in case of subletting to conservatory
- Knowledge group: rental of solar roof project does not qualify as rental of immovable property
- Agricultural standards for VAT for private use 2025 in last VAT return 2025
- Annual VAT Corrections in the Netherlands: Understanding the BUA and Private Consumption Rules
- Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation: Dutch Senate Finance Committee














