Anbi X provides supportive care in a domestic setting to people in the terminal phase of their lives X submitted claims for refunds totalling €42.778 submitted, but these were late
The Inspector declared the requests inadmissible and ruled that the amount of the refund was nil X lodged appeals and appeals, but these were declared unfounded
The Court of Appeal ruled that the delay was not excusable and the reliance on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations did not succeed
The request for compensation for non-material damage was rejected, as there was no breach of the reasonable time limit.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Plan 2026: Reduced VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Retained
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Nightclub Entry Fees with DJ Performances, Court Rules
- Proposed VAT Revision Rules for Renovation Services Starting 2026: Key Changes and Implications
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
