Anbi X provides supportive care in a domestic setting to people in the terminal phase of their lives X submitted claims for refunds totalling €42.778 submitted, but these were late
The Inspector declared the requests inadmissible and ruled that the amount of the refund was nil X lodged appeals and appeals, but these were declared unfounded
The Court of Appeal ruled that the delay was not excusable and the reliance on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations did not succeed
The request for compensation for non-material damage was rejected, as there was no breach of the reasonable time limit.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence