- The case involves the transfer of a woon(zorg)complex by the taxpayer
- The complex was rented out for eleven days before being sold in a rented state
- The court ruled that the transfer qualifies as a transfer of a business as per Article 37d of the VAT Act
- The State Secretary argues that the nature of the taxpayer’s economic activity is ‘project development’ and the buyer did not intend to continue this activity
- The AG explains the legal framework for the application of Article 37d of the VAT Act
- The AG suggests that the Supreme Court should dismiss the State Secretary’s appeal
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
