The taxpayer argued that Nakd Bars and Organix Bars are not confectionery and should be zero-rated as cakes. The FTT found them to be confectionery and not cakes, but the UT found errors in the analysis. The case was referred back to a different FTT, which concluded that the products are confectionery based on their appearance, texture, mouthfeel, density, taste, and marketing as sweet snacks. The FTT emphasized that these factors outweigh any arguments against them being confectionery. The products are marketed as “healthy snacks for people who get peckish between meals” and “a pleasant change from the chocolate and sugar bars you usually end up with if you are in a ‘snack-grabbing’ mood”.
Source
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Deductibility for Professional Fees in Share Sale Transactions
- UK Tribunal Rules Personalized Book Services VAT-Exempt as Primary Supply is Book Production
- 2025: Celebrity Traitors, Trump’s Tariffs, and the Year Tax Law Got Even Weirder
- UK to Mandate B2B E-Invoicing for All VAT Invoices Starting April 2029
- Audit Office Monitors Council’s VAT Filing Amid Potential £600k HMRC Fine Risk














