- Mrs. X organized outings where wedding dresses were tried on with accompanying accessories.
- She claimed the reduced VAT rate for this service.
- The court ruled that the 21% VAT rate was applicable.
- The services provided by Mrs. X did not fall under the specified category for reduced VAT.
- To read the full article, registration or a subscription is required.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
