- Case involves a dispute over the tax treatment of a low care hospice
- Plaintiff claims right to deduct VAT on construction costs, but the tax authority denies the deduction
- Court determines that the plaintiff’s services do not qualify for the medical exemption under the VAT law
- Plaintiff argues that the reduced tax rate should apply, but the court disagrees and classifies the services as a sui generis service subject to the normal VAT rate
- Court reviews the arguments of both parties and concludes that the tax authority correctly classified the plaintiff’s services as taxable
- Plaintiff withdraws appeals for previous years based on a promise of a refund if their position is successful
- Dispute is limited to the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients













