- The dispute involves claims for overpaid output tax on the sale of demonstrator motor vehicles between 1973 and 1996.
- The taxpayers initially accounted for VAT on the profit margin of these vehicles but later submitted claims based on the interpretation of the law in the case of Commission v Italian Republic.
- HMRC accepted these claims and settled them in 2006 under a section 85 agreement.
- However, it was later discovered that there were errors in the calculation methodology used for the claims, resulting in larger claims.
- The taxpayers submitted new claims in 2009, but HMRC rejected them.
- The taxpayers appealed, and the Upper Tribunal (UT) set aside the earlier decision due to errors of law.
- The UT concluded that the section 85 agreement precluded the taxpayers from making any further claims, even if they were valid under the correct methodology.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
