- The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that the “Change of Tariff Heading” rule for determining the non-preferential origin of goods imported into the EU is invalid.
- This case is significant because it clarifies the rules for determining the origin of goods and highlights the ECJ’s willingness to invalidate delegated legislation.
- Non-preferential rules of origin are used to determine the country of origin for products and apply to measures such as anti-dumping duties and trade embargoes.
- The ECJ found that the EC’s rule was contradictory and discriminatory, and that the EC had exceeded its powers in adopting it.
- This ruling suggests that the rules for determining origin may not be as legally binding as previously thought.
Source Baker & McKenzie
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECG T-689/24: Confirms Incompatibility of Polish Input VAT Deduction Rules with EU Law
- Electricity Breakdown at Customs: HS 8502 or HS 8504 – 0% or 10% Duty?
- Conference Vienna University: Court of Justice of the European Union: Recent VAT Case Law (March 10-12)
- Comments on ECJ Case T-643/24: Unauthorised Music Use Qualifies as VAT-Taxable Service
- EU Approves Updated E-Invoicing Standard EN 16931-1 for B2B and 2030 Digital Reporting
