- The case is about whether the appellant is entitled to a deduction for VAT on legal costs.
- The appellant calculated the VAT as 20% of the legal costs incurred in two court cases against SKAT.
- The court ruled that the taxable legal services were provided to and paid by SKAT, not the appellant.
- The court found that there was not enough support in the legal guidelines or case law to allow a deduction for VAT on legal costs paid to the opposing party.
- The court upheld the lower court’s decision.
- The reference is to section 37 of the VAT Act.
- The editorial note mentions the previous instance of the case in the district court.
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- VAT Deduction Denied for Luxury Car Purchases Intended for Resale—Not Considered Economic Activity
- Denmark Debates Cutting VAT on Food Amid Government Disagreement Over Model and Scope
- Government Divided Over Priorities in Negotiations to Reduce VAT on Food Items
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
- Denmark Unveils Tax Reform: Cuts on Sweets, Coffee, VAT on Books, and Business Incentives














