The VAT exemption for transfers of money requires the service to comprise the actual effecting of a transfer of legal title in the funds. It is not sufficient if it sets off a chain of events inevitably and automatically leading to the transfer. This interpretation by the UK Supreme Court of the CJEU’s case-law is perhaps beyond reproach – but it does render the exemption painfully narrow, and leads to services being taxed that are integral to the overall transfer and, from a consumer’s perspective, just as indistinguishable. As I have argued in my paper before, this might be an area where the post-Brexit UK can consider legislative intervention.
Source Fabian Barth
See also
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
