- The High Court has delivered its judgment in a case for judicial review concerning the Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust’s claim for a VAT concession.
- The Trust claims that it is entitled to a concession for the repayment of input tax paid on the purchase of specialist radiation therapy devices.
- The devices were purchased from Varian and the Trust argues that the VAT incurred by NHS Supply Chain, which was passed on to the Trust, is recoverable.
- The Trust is part of the NHS VAT Division and the Concession permits tax deduction for the business activities of entities in this division.
- The Trust initially sought to recover the VAT under VATA94 but was refused as it did not hold a VAT invoice.
- The Trust relies on the Concession and an NHS published Note (1/98) to support its claim for recovery of the input tax.
- The Court held that the Trust falls within the terms of the Concession and Note 1/98 and that HMRC made public law errors in reaching a contrary conclusion.
- Trusts in similar circumstances may consider submitting a claim if they have been refused the use of the concession.
Source: caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices
- HMRC Updates Notice 700/45: Correcting VAT Errors, Claims, and Penalties Guidance Revised
- HMRC Updates VAT Notice 700/45: New Guidelines for Correcting Errors and Claiming Refunds