In another case involving a business that purchased automobiles and substantially enhanced them before reselling them, the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals held that the business owed Ohio use tax on the purchases and that Ohio’s resale exemption did not apply because the automobiles were fundamentally and substantially altered before resale.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- USTR Evaluates Extending Section 301 Tariff Exclusions on Chinese Imports Beyond November 2025
- Washington DOR Issues Guidance on Tax Implications for Existing Contracts Under New Law
- Washington Taxpayer Challenges New Tax on Advertising Services Under ITFA
- California Use Tax Applies to In-State Repair Parts, Even if Device is Shipped Out-of-State
- Implementing Certain Tariff-Related Elements of the United States-Japan Agreement
