In the opinion of the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, the activities described above viewed in conjunction do not justify the conclusion that the renovation has been so radical that it has essentially created a manufactured building within the meaning of Article 11, paragraph 3, letter b, of the OB Act.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
