Granting access to the performances and providing the intermission drink for VAT purposes must be regarded as distinct and independent performances. In that case, it is not in dispute that the inspector correctly taxed the alcoholic intermission drinks at the regular VAT rate. In view of what the Supreme Court considered in the judgment of 18 November 2022 under 3.3.2, the Court sees reason to rule that in this case too no tax interest should be calculated over the period that the inspector, and therefore not the interested party, had the tax amount due.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
- Decree on Mediation in Securities Transactions with Instructions on the Scope of the Concept of Mediation Published
- Tax Penalty for VAT Reduced Due to Incidental Carelessness; Court Lowers Fine to €1,500
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
