Granting access to the performances and providing the intermission drink for VAT purposes must be regarded as distinct and independent performances. In that case, it is not in dispute that the inspector correctly taxed the alcoholic intermission drinks at the regular VAT rate. In view of what the Supreme Court considered in the judgment of 18 November 2022 under 3.3.2, the Court sees reason to rule that in this case too no tax interest should be calculated over the period that the inspector, and therefore not the interested party, had the tax amount due.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Amendments to VAT Compensation Fund Scheme for Investment Services Effective April 2026
- Court Rejects Proposed Settlement in VAT Fraud Case Due to Evidence and Sentence Concerns
- Dutch Tax Administration Update: Emergency VAT E-commerce Track Extended to 2028, Digital Mail Option in 2025
- Amendment to VAT Compensation Fund Rules for Investment Services Effective April 2026














