The Court of Amsterdam decides that director X has rightly been held liable for the turnover tax owed by the company but which has remained unpaid. X has deliberately submitted incorrect VAT returns on behalf of the company. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No excusable delay in the event of late VAT refund requests
- Pension fund provides VAT-exempt insurance services during the performance of the benefit agreement
- Additional VAT Assessments Upheld; Misdemeanor Fines Dismissed
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
