The Court of Amsterdam decides that director X has rightly been held liable for the turnover tax owed by the company but which has remained unpaid. X has deliberately submitted incorrect VAT returns on behalf of the company. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance
