The court is of the opinion that plaintiff, an educational institution, does not carry out any economic activity with the education it provides to students under the age of 18 and with the BOL training. Plaintiff must divide the costs it has incurred for both its economic and non-economic activities for the right to deduct input tax into a part for which it is entitled to deduct input tax and a part for which it does not have that right (the so-called ‘ pre-pro rata’).
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Land Development VAT and Transfer Tax: How Things Can Go Wrong
- Squash and Padel Court Rentals Are VAT-Exempt
- VAT Deduction Denied; Penalty Reduced Over Reconciliation Differences
- Dutch Court Rules on Own-Building Status in Renovation Works VAT Case
- Hague Court of Appeal Upholds VAT Appeal Admissibility and Legitimate Expectations
