The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X did not provide the medical services in its own name. It does not follow from the documents submitted by X that it carries out the observations in its own name. The inspector therefore rightly imposed the additional VAT assessment on X.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT aspects of the 2026-2030 Coalition Agreement
- General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – Questions – Transfer of a Totality of Assets: Economic Continuity vs. Supplier Intention
- Zero rate rightly refused due to VAT fraud
- No VAT Deduction Without Proper Evidence: Burden of Proof on Entrepreneur After Late Filing
- Zero VAT Rate Denied Due to Knowledge of UK VAT Fraud in Metal Trade Chain
