HMRC keep taking cases on non-economic activity, looking to disallow large amounts of VAT on the grounds it is attributable to (used by) the non-economic activity even when it is clear, as here, that the non-economic activity (free services in this case) is done for a business purpose and to stimulate the generation of taxable income. This line of argument goes all the way back to the Imperial War Museum case (free admission for some people on some days) and of course more recently we have seen cases like Sveda, Ibedrola, ANL, Will Woodlands, Durham Cathedral etc.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
- Navigating UK VAT: Key Considerations and Pitfalls in Exporting Goods
- HMRC’s New VAT Error Correction Rules: Stricter Penalties and Reporting Changes Explained
