The Court found it sufficiently plausible that the State’s claims were upheld in proceedings on the merits. Because the State also had a sufficiently urgent interest in those claims for the provision of information to the defendants, the Court granted the claims, on the understanding that the relevant data may not be used for tax fines or criminal prosecution insofar as it concerned will-dependent material.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Preliminary Questions on VAT Transfer of Business Assets in Real Estate Transactions in the Netherlands
- Answers to Parliamentary Questions on Revision of Regulation 904/2010: EOM and OLAF Access to VAT Data
- Contractual Relationships Key for VAT Refunds on Irrecoverable Debts Within Fiscal Entities
- EU Regulation to Grant EOM and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating Cross-Border Fraud
- VAT Refund on Unpaid Device Credit: Legal Distinction Within Fiscal Unity Required
