The Court of Appeal decided that with regard to the products and services auctioned by X all relevant information about that service/delivery was already made known during the auction, so that there was a clearly identifiable performance. This did not alter the fact that the coupon was not always cashed because also in those cases it was clear to the consumer to which performance his bid or the coupon related.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Sunscreen Taxed at 21% VAT Because Marketing Authorization Was Missing
- VAT Exemptions for a Member of a Fiscal Unity
- Medical VAT exemption for VAT group requires member to meet all conditions
- VAT Reduced Rate Denied for Sunscreen Products Under Dutch Tax Law
- General Court VAT Case – T-444/25 (Cavert) – Judgment – VAT Exemptions for Public Interest Activities within a VAT Group Require Individual Member Compliance
