The Civil Chamber of the District Court of Noord-Holland ruled that Q violated his duty of care in September/October 2017. He has therefore failed to fulfill his obligations under the contract for services.
A and B operate a webshop in party supplies. In 2017, the company is contributed to P bv. Q carries out administrative work for P bv. In 2018, Q establishes that the threshold amount for distance sales to Belgian consumers has been exceeded. P bv should therefore have filed a VAT return in Belgium. The Belgian tax authorities impose additional VAT assessments on P bv for 2016 and 2017, imposing a penalty and charging penalty interest. P bv requests Q to compensate the damage suffered by it.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No deduction for VAT on consultancy costs for business succession within family
- VAT exemption for games of chance: strict interpretation for B2B game content
- Court Decision on Tax Rate for Art Products: Classification and Maker Status Dispute
- Tax Deduction Dispute: Business Use of Apartment and VAT Reclaim Rights in Court Ruling
- Peppol E-Invoicing in the Netherlands: Digital Transformation and Future Integration Strategies
