The Civil Chamber of the District Court of Noord-Holland ruled that Q violated his duty of care in September/October 2017. He has therefore failed to fulfill his obligations under the contract for services.
A and B operate a webshop in party supplies. In 2017, the company is contributed to P bv. Q carries out administrative work for P bv. In 2018, Q establishes that the threshold amount for distance sales to Belgian consumers has been exceeded. P bv should therefore have filed a VAT return in Belgium. The Belgian tax authorities impose additional VAT assessments on P bv for 2016 and 2017, imposing a penalty and charging penalty interest. P bv requests Q to compensate the damage suffered by it.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives
