According to BV X, a showroom or website was not necessary because the trade often took place in a more or less private setting. According to the District Court, BV X had not made this concrete with objective data. It had not submitted any documents showing how it had attempted to gain a position on the market for exclusive cars and which channels or contacts it had used.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Negative Annual Balance Dispute in VAT Margin Scheme for Youngtimer Cars and Watches
- €10,000 Fine for Late and Incorrect VAT Returns
- Interim use of horse does not preclude the application of zero rate for export
- Limburg Worries About Higher VAT on Flowers and Plants
- Tax Fraud Conviction for VAT Filing Offenses
