Dutch VAT nevertheless due for construction with Swiss AG
The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court ruled that the inspector was right to impose the additional VAT assessment. It is unclear which services X bv provides, but in any case it does not make it plausible that the place of its services is not the Netherlands. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Ruling on VAT Deduction for School Renovation and Penalty Assessment, 20 March 2026
- Dutch Ornamental Horticulture VAT to Rise from 9% to 21% Starting January 2028
- Tax Assessment Upheld for Municipality Due to VAT Abuse in “School Model” Construction Scheme
- Scope of Reverse-Charge Scheme for Subcontracted Agricultural Work on Immovable Property by Contractors
- Management services for industry-wide pension fund taxed with VAT
