Dutch VAT nevertheless due for construction with Swiss AG
The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court ruled that the inspector was right to impose the additional VAT assessment. It is unclear which services X bv provides, but in any case it does not make it plausible that the place of its services is not the Netherlands. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Tax Group Withdraws Position on VAT Correction for Private Use of Company Cars
- Netherlands Mandates eInvoices for EU VAT Refunds from April 2026
- VAT Rules Make Open Access Publishing More Expensive for Universities and Researchers
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal Confirms VAT Ruling on Supply of Magic Truffles as Foodstuffs
- End VAT Subsidy on Alcoholic Beverages in Composite Transactions: A Call for Legislative Action
