Dutch VAT nevertheless due for construction with Swiss AG
The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court ruled that the inspector was right to impose the additional VAT assessment. It is unclear which services X bv provides, but in any case it does not make it plausible that the place of its services is not the Netherlands. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Rules Landowner Acted as VAT Entrepreneur in Sale of Two Building Plots
- VAT on Registration Fees for Legal Services: Burdened Services, Place of Supply, Principle of Equality Disputed
- Photoproducts Not Classified as Art Objects; No 9% VAT Rate, Court Rules
- VAT Assessment: Composite and Independent Services to German Clients, Taxable in Germany and the Netherlands
- Bill to Implement EU VAT in the Digital Age Directive: Single VAT Registration Provisions
