Dutch VAT nevertheless due for construction with Swiss AG
The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court ruled that the inspector was right to impose the additional VAT assessment. It is unclear which services X bv provides, but in any case it does not make it plausible that the place of its services is not the Netherlands. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Bicycle Maintenance Package Qualifies as Separate Service at Reduced VAT Rate
- Netherlands: Export Zero Rate Denied for Sport Horse Used in EU Competitions
- Netherlands: Supreme Court Rules Minor Home Use Blocks VAT-Taxed Rental of Office Room
- Netherlands: Self-employed childcare worker eligible for VAT exemption on childcare services
- Netherlands: Florists Warn VAT Hike on Flowers and Plants Will Kill Jobs
