A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway’s 2027 Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing: EHF 3.0 ERP Compliance
- Norway Proposes Mandatory E-Invoicing from 1 January 2027
- Norway Approves Mandatory E-Invoicing and Digital Bookkeeping Reform
- VAT Treatment of Temporary Housing: Not Real Estate, but Goods
- Parliament Approves Mandatory E-Invoicing and Digital Bookkeeping
