A has appealed [tax office x]’s binding prior statement […] of 5 April 2017. [Tax office x] concluded in the BFU that a planned joint registration, where A is the reporting entity, could not demand a recurring tax settlement according to the Value Added Tax Act § 8- 6 for input VAT, which was incurred within a D-joint registration.
Source: skatteetaten.no
Latest Posts in "Norway"
- Norway Proposes Mandatory E-Invoicing for Businesses Starting in 2027
- The End of the Paper Era: How the Nordic Countries Are Redefining the Future of VAT and Tax Compliance
- Norway Proposes Mandatory E-Invoicing from 2027
- Norway Updates Access Rights in New Altinn System
- Norway Announces Full VAT Refunds for Construction of New Sports Facilities in 2026
