The nonresident entity was using the factory, warehouse, and premises of the Spanish subsidiary and was even providing instructions to the subsidiary’s employees. In addition, the Swiss entity assumed all the risks. The court concluded that the Spanish subsidiary was a permanent establishment in Spain for VAT purposes and was required to charge Spanish VAT on its sales in Spain.
Source: Deloitte
See also THIS post about this case.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Spain Mandates B2B E-Invoicing with Phased Rollout Under New Royal Decree
- Bizkaia: New Rules for VAT Model 369 on Distance Sales Effective April 2026
- Spain introduces extraordinary SII exit window after VERI*FACTU delay
- Spain Approves Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing; Phased Rollout Pending Ministerial Order Details
- Gibraltar Cuts Proposed Fuel Duty Rate by Half to GBP0.14 per Litre












