The nonresident entity was using the factory, warehouse, and premises of the Spanish subsidiary and was even providing instructions to the subsidiary’s employees. In addition, the Swiss entity assumed all the risks. The court concluded that the Spanish subsidiary was a permanent establishment in Spain for VAT purposes and was required to charge Spanish VAT on its sales in Spain.
Source: Deloitte
See also THIS post about this case.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Spain’s 2027 E-Invoicing Mandate: Key Requirements and Deadlines for All B2B Businesses
- Spain’s 2027 E-Invoicing Mandate: Key Requirements and Steps for B2B Businesses
- VAT Deemed Included in Contract Price if Not Mentioned and Cannot Be Charged Later, TEAC Rules
- Spanish Tax Authority Rules Against Artificial VAT Deductions in School Property Leasing Case
- Self-Employed Using POS Must Adapt to VERI*FACTU by July 1, 2026, Even for Tickets
