The VVD government party wants to know from State Secretary Vijlbrief of Finance why he sees no added value in shortening the VAT repayment term from 1 year to, for example, 3 months, ‘unlike the VVD’, and why there would be ‘no added value’, such as the Tax authorities recently reported. VVD member Lodders calls the attitude of the tax authorities rigid.
Source: accountancyvanmorgen.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Raises Accommodation VAT to 21%, Keeps 9% Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports
- Uncertainty Over VAT on Pension Premiums: State Secretary Maintains Policy Amid Conflicting Court Rulings
- Uncertainty Over VAT on Pension Premiums: State Secretary Maintains Policy Amid Conflicting Court Rulings
- Pension Administration Remains a Single VAT-Exempt Service Pending Supreme Court Decision
- State Secretary Rejects Court Rulings: Pension Premiums Remain VAT-Exempt Pending Supreme Court Decision
