- The case involves a transaction between two Romanian taxpayers where the seller incorrectly charged VAT on asset sales. Initially, both companies treated the transaction as subject to VAT, leading the buyer to deduct input tax. However, audits revealed conflicting interpretations, with the seller’s audit suggesting VAT applicability and the buyer’s audit concluding it was not taxable.
- After lengthy legal proceedings spanning nine years, the Court determined that while the buyer cannot deduct input tax due to the transaction being non-VAT applicable, they still have the right to seek a refund directly from the tax authorities for the VAT paid to the seller. This ruling highlighted the complexities surrounding VAT corrections and the limitations on suppliers’ abilities to amend invoices.
- The Court’s reasoning emphasized that member states must define procedures for VAT corrections and that the buyer’s claim to the tax authorities does not equate to a right of deduction. This decision underscores the importance of understanding VAT obligations and rights, especially in cases of misapplied VAT, and serves as a crucial precedent for similar disputes in the future.
See also
Sources
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Podcast by Piotr Chojnocki
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.