The Advocate General’s opinion, delivered on March 6, 2025, addresses the interpretation of customs legislation, specifically concerning the conditions under which customs authorities can repay or remit incorrectly collected duties. The case involves YX and Logística i Gestió Caves Andorranes i Vidal SA against the French customs authorities regarding the repayment of customs duties that were levied due to an incorrect application of customs rules between 1988 and 1991.
Legal Framework
- Regulation No 1430/79: This regulation outlines the conditions for the repayment or remission of import and export duties. It specifies that import duties can be repaid if it is established they were not legally owed and sets a three-year time limit for applications for repayment.
- Community Customs Code: Established a uniform customs procedural law, which emphasizes the need for legal certainty and proper functioning of customs administrations, and includes similar provisions regarding repayment of wrongly collected duties.
- Union Customs Code: Reinforces the repayment process and specifies the conditions under which customs duties can be repaid, including the authorities’ obligation to initiate repayments when they discover duties were wrongly collected.
Facts and Legal Questions
- The case arose when Andorran importers, through a customs agent in France, were charged customs duties for goods imported into Andorra. The French customs authorities previously required these goods to be released for free circulation, a requirement deemed unlawful by the European Commission. The importers seek repayment for duties wrongly collected, arguing that the customs authorities have a duty to act on their own initiative to correct this.
- The Court of Cassation (France) refers two questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU):
- Whether customs authorities are limited to a three-year period for repayments or if they must establish the duties were not legally owed within that timeframe.
- Whether authorities must know the identities of operators and the amounts owed to initiate repayments without conducting extensive research.
Analysis
- Obligation to Repay: The opinion emphasizes that EU customs law mandates authorities to repay duties not owed. There are two procedures for repayment: one requiring an application by the debtor and the other allowing authorities to act on their initiative within three years of the duties being recorded.
- Three-Year Limitation Period: While there is a three-year period for submitting applications for repayment, the repayment itself can occur after this period if the necessary conditions are met within the three years, namely that the authorities recognize the duties were wrongly collected.
- Investigative Obligations: The customs authorities must proactively ensure they have the necessary information to identify the operators and the amounts owed. They should not rely solely on the operators to provide this information, especially in cases of serious administrative errors. The level of inquiry required should be proportionate to the situation’s seriousness.
- Good Administration Principles: The opinion asserts that customs authorities must adhere to principles of good administration, including the obligation to communicate effectively with operators regarding their rights and the conditions for repayment. This entails a duty to justify administrative decisions and to treat affected operators fairly.
Conclusion
- The Advocate General concludes that customs authorities must act on their own initiative to repay wrongly collected duties if they recognize the conditions for repayment within three years. They must ensure they have sufficient knowledge about the involved operators and the amounts to be repaid, while also being proactive in their investigations. This approach balances the need for legal certainty with the rights of operators under EU law, ensuring that they are not disadvantaged by administrative oversights.
Source
