VATupdate

Share this post on

Comments on ECJ case C-527/23: Ruling on Input VAT Deduction for Intra-Group Services to Subsidiaries

  • Foserco SA is a company within the Weatherford group but not part of a VAT group
  • Foserco received administrative services from other Weatherford companies outside Romania and declared VAT liabilities under the reverse charge scheme
  • Tax authorities denied Foserco’s input VAT deduction due to lack of proof linking received services to its taxable outputs
  • ECJ ruled that input VAT deduction requires a direct link between procured services and the recipient’s output supplies
  • General expenses linked to a company’s overall economic activity qualify for input VAT deduction
  • ECJ found it irrelevant that services were provided to multiple group companies simultaneously
  • The necessity or appropriateness of the acquired services for the recipient is also irrelevant
  • The court must verify if Foserco’s share of costs corresponds to the services used for its taxed supplies
  • Foserco must provide proof for the input VAT deduction claims
  • Provision of services to multiple group recipients does not prevent input VAT deduction
  • Taxable persons have the autonomy to decide which services they need without proving necessity or appropriateness for VAT deduction purposes

Source: kmlz.de

See also



 

Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.

Sponsors:

VAT news

Advertisements:

  • vatcomsult