- The court of Zeeland-West-Brabant ruled that ‘self billing’ does not provide sufficient evidence for VAT refunds.
- A holding and its two subsidiaries, forming a fiscal unity for VAT, submitted eleven refund requests.
- The tax inspector rejected these requests, suspecting VAT fraud.
- The fiscal unity appealed, presenting invoices related to transactions with four entrepreneurs.
- These invoices were self-generated by the fiscal unity and payments were made through offsetting.
- The fiscal unity did not comply with the tax authority’s request for additional information.
- The court found the invoices unconvincing, leading to the rightful rejection of the VAT refund request.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Settlement on VAT Revision for City Office Limits Refund, Court Awards €33,105 Plus Statutory Interest
- Dutch Court: Fiscal Representation Cannot Be Required for VAT Zero-Rate Where Mutual Assistance Exists
- Supreme Court Refers VAT Deduction Dispute on Mixed Costs in Financial Instruments to Hague Court
- No VAT Deduction Allowed for ICT Manager’s Mobile Phone Bundles, Court Rules
- No Penalty for Lack of Intent in Dutch VAT Non-Payment, Supreme Court Rules













