- The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the claim of abuse of law in a case involving chaining the lease of real estate with VAT
- The applicant purchased a property and claimed a VAT deduction, then rented it to a company and applied VAT on the rental
- The tax administrator accused the applicant of purposeful abuse of the law, but the Supreme Administrative Court disagreed
- The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural rules and the tax administrator’s burden of proof in proving abuse of law
- The Court did not comment on the lease and subsequent sublease model, noting that it may appear irrational in some cases but could be logical in others.
Source: pkfapogeo.cz
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
