- The case of Procurement International Ltd (PIL) involved the issue of whether the movement of goods constituted a zero-rated export
- PIL supplied goods to customers who run reward recognition programmes, with a shipper collecting the goods from PIL in the UK and shipping them directly to the reward recipients (RR) overseas
- HMRC argued that there was a standard-rated supply when the goods were physically located in the UK, while PIL contended that the supply of delivered goods was zero-rated when removed to a location outside the UK
- The First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) held that the supplies were a zero-rated supply of exported goods by PIL, as the RPOs took title to the goods at the time of delivery to the RR
- The appeal was allowed, and the assessment was withdrawn based on the interpretation of domestic legislation, specifically The VAT Act 1994, Section 6(2)
Source: marcusward.co
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
- Navigating UK VAT: Key Considerations and Pitfalls in Exporting Goods
- HMRC’s New VAT Error Correction Rules: Stricter Penalties and Reporting Changes Explained
- UK Supreme Court Confirms VAT on Intragroup Fees for Former VAT Group Members