- California Office of Tax Appeals opinion states that charges for snow production using customer’s water are subject to tax
- Sales involving tangible personal property do not always require transfer of title or possession
- Variations among states in taxability of services related to tangible personal property
- Snowmagic in New Jersey contracted to produce artificial snow for theme park customers in California
- California Department of Tax and Fee Administration determined that Snowmagic should have collected and remitted sales tax for producing artificial snow
- CDFTA argued that Snowmagic’s production of snow using customers’ water constitutes a taxable sale
- Snowmagic’s arguments against taxability were rejected by the OTA
Source: aprio.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
