The District Court of Amsterdam ruled that it had not been sufficiently established that X made an active or passive contribution to cat-catcher constructions, leading to a full acquittal for filing incorrect VAT returns and forgery of documents. X trades in used cars internationally, and criminal investigations have been ongoing against a business relation and two of their contacts. The court found that X’s administration was in good order, and the discrepancies between delivery and business addresses were plausibly explained by the nature of the international car trade.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance
