- Inspector claims that input tax deducted by X is related to non-business expenses
- Corrected VAT in housing, sales, and office costs for 2013 and 2014
- X did not sufficiently prove the business nature of most costs
- Input tax on representation costs not deductible under Article 15, paragraph 5, VAT Act 1968
- Use of iPads for business purposes not adequately proven for third iPad
- Court ruled that the assessments were not too high and dismissed the appeal
- Case heard by the Court of Den Bosch on July 10, 2024
- VAT period: 2013-2014
- Case numbers: 22/1031; 22/1032; 22/1033
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Hospice performance does not qualify as exempt service or short stay
- Assessment of Dispute: Single or Multiple Services in Hospice Guest Care and Tax Implications
- Netherlands Suspends €2 Handling Fee on Non-EU Parcels, Awaits EU Customs Measures in 2026
- Decision on the introduction of a national handling fee postponed
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema













