- Calcutta High Court ruled that the Adjudicating Authority cannot rely on an advance ruling from another state
- The case involved a Goods Transport Agency service provider who was facing GST recovery and penalty under CGST Act
- The Appellate Authority dropped the fraud allegation but continued the adjudication under Section 73 of CGST Act
- The Petitioner obtained a declaration from Indian Oil Corporation confirming GST payment for GTA services
- The High Court remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority due to the timely declaration by IOCL
- The High Court stated that an AAR ruling from Goa cannot automatically apply to a taxpayer in West Bengal
Source: elplaw.in
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Mining Lease Royalty: Classification, Applicable Rate, and Reverse Charge Mechanism Clarified
- CESTAT: Software Preloaded in Imported Hardware Includible in Customs Value, No Penalty on Wipro
- GST Compliance for Foreign Currency Invoicing: Key Requirements for Indian Exporters
- US Formally Lifts Russia-Linked 25% Tariff on Indian Imports, Confirms 18% Reciprocal Rate
- Fake GST Invoice Scams Persist Despite Crackdown: Shell Firms, Circular Trading Fuel Tax Evasion
