The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal ruled that the inspector violated the principle of defense regarding the additional assessment related to VAT-taxed hockey lessons provided by Entrepreneur X. The inspector did not inform X or his advisor in a timely and explicit manner about the intended additional assessments, and did not provide sufficient detail about the elements underlying the additional assessment. This lack of communication violated X’s right to defend himself.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
