The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal ruled that the inspector violated the principle of defense regarding the additional assessment related to VAT-taxed hockey lessons provided by Entrepreneur X. The inspector did not inform X or his advisor in a timely and explicit manner about the intended additional assessments, and did not provide sufficient detail about the elements underlying the additional assessment. This lack of communication violated X’s right to defend himself.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No deduction for VAT on consultancy costs for business succession within family
- VAT exemption for games of chance: strict interpretation for B2B game content
- Court Decision on Tax Rate for Art Products: Classification and Maker Status Dispute
- Tax Deduction Dispute: Business Use of Apartment and VAT Reclaim Rights in Court Ruling
- Peppol E-Invoicing in the Netherlands: Digital Transformation and Future Integration Strategies
