During the objection phase, the administrative body is required to make documents available for inspection for at least one week prior to the hearing. This is considered a passive provision of information. Sending documents directly to the interested party is considered an active provision of information. In this case, the Tax Officer fulfilled the duty of passive information provision by making the documents available for inspection and by sending the Tariff Calculation to the resident. The Court of Appeal emphasized that it is not up to the resident to impose conditions on the Tax Officer before being invited to a hearing. The Court also stated that there is no legal basis for such conditions, and imposing them would seriously hinder the objection process.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance