- The case involves the interpretation of the Dutch VAT law regarding circumcision performed by a qualified doctor for religious, cultural, or hygienic reasons
- The appeal argues that the assessment of whether a procedure serves a therapeutic purpose requires a medical evaluation by qualified medical personnel
- The appeal further argues that circumcision, even without a medical reason, can serve a therapeutic-preventive purpose and should be considered as healthcare
- The concept of healthcare provision is defined in the VAT directive and Dutch law, specifying that only treatments that can be considered as medical care are exempt from VAT.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
