The dispute concerns large marshmallows, which are marketed as perfect for roasting and s’mores. HMRC argued that the marshmallows could be eaten as a snack and were listed as sweets on the taxpayer’s website. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) considered various factors and concluded that the marshmallows were not confectionery and should be zero-rated. The Upper Tribunal (UT) supported the FTT’s approach and dismissed HMRC’s arguments.
Source KPMG
Join our Linkedin Group on ”VAT Rates – Legislative changes”, click HERE
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Rules on Online Prize Draws Face Scrutiny Amid New Voluntary Code and Industry Growth
- How UK Businesses Accidentally Trigger US State Sales Tax Through Ecommerce and Economic Nexus
- Director Liable for VAT Fraud and PAYE/NIC on Withdrawals: Ellis & Anor v HMRC (2026)
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024–25, HMRC Reports 6.5% Shortfall
- Luzha v HMRC: VAT Late Submission Penalties Upheld, No Reasonable Excuse Found, Appeal Dismissed













