The dispute concerns large marshmallows, which are marketed as perfect for roasting and s’mores. HMRC argued that the marshmallows could be eaten as a snack and were listed as sweets on the taxpayer’s website. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) considered various factors and concluded that the marshmallows were not confectionery and should be zero-rated. The Upper Tribunal (UT) supported the FTT’s approach and dismissed HMRC’s arguments.
Source KPMG
Join our Linkedin Group on ”VAT Rates – Legislative changes”, click HERE
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- FINTUA Global VAT Guide for September 2025
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
