The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that the inspector was correct in adjusting the input tax on accommodation/air conditioning costs, other accommodation costs, and scaffolding costs. X BV, a coaching and training company, failed to prove that it had access to the room with the air conditioning or that it was the recipient of the other services. The fines imposed on X BV of 10% and 25% were deemed appropriate and necessary.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
