- ECJ rules on whether a subsidiary can be a fixed establishment for VAT purposes
- A fixed establishment is characterized by permanence and structure in terms of resources
- Supplies between a fixed establishment and its head office are generally not subject to VAT
- The SC Adient case involved two group companies, Adient Germany and Adient Romania
- Adient Romania provided services to Adient Germany, which were considered VAT taxable in Germany
- Romanian tax authorities considered Adient Romania to be a fixed establishment of Adient Germany
Source: bdo.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- European Commission VAT Gap Report 2025: EU Faces Billions in Lost VAT Revenue
- EGC – T-268/25 (Sampension Livsforsikring) -AG Opinion – 100% ownership rule permissible if proportionate against tax avoidance
- EGC VAT Case – T-233/25 (Mokoryte) – Judgment – Subcontractor Cannot Adjust VAT for Unpaid Assigned Claim from Insolvent Developer
- Ecofin Council: government aims to reduce the regulatory burden and limit access to VAT information
- EU Set to Grant Anti-Fraud Agencies Limited Access to VAT Data Under New Bill
