- The Supreme Court ruled on a case involving a cooperative insurance service and VAT.
- Cooperative X UA provided services in the insurance sector and was considered a fiscal entity under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the VAT Act.
- X offered truck and car insurance (both liability and comprehensive).
- X provided coverage for incidents occurring in other EU member states and EEA member states.
- In certain cases, X was not allowed to handle claims directly and had to appoint a claims adjuster in the relevant member state to settle the claims on its behalf.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
