- The Supreme Court ruled on a case involving a cooperative insurance service and VAT.
- Cooperative X UA provided services in the insurance sector and was considered a fiscal entity under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the VAT Act.
- X offered truck and car insurance (both liability and comprehensive).
- X provided coverage for incidents occurring in other EU member states and EEA member states.
- In certain cases, X was not allowed to handle claims directly and had to appoint a claims adjuster in the relevant member state to settle the claims on its behalf.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Plan 2026: Reduced VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Retained
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Nightclub Entry Fees with DJ Performances, Court Rules
- Proposed VAT Revision Rules for Renovation Services Starting 2026: Key Changes and Implications
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
