- ET and her husband WT acquired and sold various plots without paying VAT
- Tax authorities imposed a VAT debt, claiming that the sale of the plots constitutes an economic activity
- The referring judge in Poland is unsure about the interpretation of the term ‘economic activity’ in the VAT Directive
- The judge questions whether it is relevant that the land’s destination was changed at the couple’s initiative
- The judge also wants to know if a group of jointly acting natural persons falls under the term ‘person’ in the VAT Directive
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-121/24: Non-payment of declared VAT does not constitute VAT fraud
- European Parliament Approves Simplifications to Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: In-game gold: AG Kokott’s advice on VAT exemption, vouchers & margin scheme
- AG Kokott’s Opinion: VAT Exemption, Vouchers, and Margin Scheme for In-Game Gold Trading
- EU Reaches Agreement on 2028 Customs Reform
