- Qubic Advisory Services Ltd appealed against penalties imposed by HMRC for breaching invoicing and record-keeping requirements
- The penalties amounted to £14,821,830 under section 69A, Value Added Tax Act 1994
- QASL argued that the requirements did not apply to them as the relevant investment gold was never delivered to customers
- The Upper Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that QASL did not have to meet the invoicing and record-keeping requirements
- This decision provides commentary on the limits of record-keeping and invoicing requirements in VAT Regulations.
Source: rpc.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Recovery Falls Despite Increased Crackdown on Business Tax Avoidance, HMRC Figures Show
- VAT Late Filing Penalties: Software Failure and Employee Error Not Reasonable Excuse, Appeal Dismissed
- Corrupt Directors Jailed for £20m VAT Fraud After Secret Meetings and Fake Offshore Schemes
- Input VAT Denied: Insufficient Evidence and Pre-Registration Supplies—SM Development North West Ltd Appeal Dismissed
- HMRC Cannot Deny Input VAT Recovery Where Valid Invoice Exists: Eurocent (Buckingham) Ltd v HMRC
